Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Earth Portal describes itself as a "timely, objective, and science-based" portal for environmental information.The three branches of Earth Portal set out to build a global collection of scholarly infor mation regarding the Earth and its environment, to foster civil dialogue surrounding issues of human interaction with our environment, and to distribute news regarding current developments and expertdriven conversations about environmental issues."Encyclopedia of Earth" is a free digital reference work containing key information about the Earth and its environment; an international body of scholars develops the encyclopedia's content."Earth Forum" is a moderated conversation space that allows the public to converse with selected experts on issues of environmental science."Earth News" distributes current information about the environmental sciences aggregated from selected media outlets, the editors of the "Encyclopedia of Earth," and authors of the week.Earth Portal provides authoritative (or at least well-sourced), nonpartisan, and science-based infor mation on the environment."Encyclopedia of Earth" is the most visible part of Earth Portal.It is an electronic reference work containing more than 3,500 articles written or evaluated by more than 1,000 scholars from 60 nations around the world.Explicitly created to fi ll the need for authoritative and sourced environmental science infor mation, the encyclopedia competes with unsourced and crowd-sourced information sources, such as can be found in Wikipedia or through a Google search."Encyclopedia of Earth" provides a searchable and browsa ble collection of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it