MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245725761 · doi:10.1017/s0305741017001655

CQY volume 232 Cover and Front matter

2017· article· en· W4245725761 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe China Quarterly · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHarvard Graduate School of EducationUniversität Duisburg-EssenUniversity of TorontoUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of MinnesotaBeijing Normal UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityGeorge Washington UniversityAarhus UniversitetSan Diego State UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of WashingtonMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyYale University
KeywordsFront coverCover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Front (military)Content (measure theory)Action (physics)Computer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeographyPhysicsMathematicsEngineeringMeteorologyMechanical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subscription price which includes electronic access and delivery by air where appropriate (but excluding VAT) of volumes 229 to 232 in 2017 is £219.00(US $362.00 in USA, Canada and Mexico) for institutions; £46.00 (US $80.00) for individuals ordering direct from the publishers and certifying that the journal is for their personal use.Students can subscribe at £21 (US $37).Single parts are £62.00net (US $104.00 in USA, Canada and Mexico) plus postage.EU subscribers (outside the UK) who are not registered for VAT should add VAT at their country's rate.VAT registered members should provide their VAT registration number.Japanese prices for institutions (including ASP delivery) are available from Kinokuniya Company Ltd, P.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9440.868

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe China QuarterlySame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207