Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2020), "Index", Brunori, G. and Grando, S. (Ed.) Innovation for Sustainability (Research in Rural Sociology and Development, Vol. 25), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1057-192220200000025012 Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited Copyright © 2020 Emerald Publishing Limited INDEX Access-centred approach, 20 Access-to-assets models, 71 Action theory, 71 Actor–network theories, 181 Adaptive capacity, 75 Adjustment costs, 135–136 Adoption-Diffusion Model (ADM), 138 AFNs. See Alternative food networks (AFNs) Agency-oriented factors, 71 Agency theory, 144 Agricultural Household Model (AHM), 129, 146 Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems (AKIS), 5, 137, 173 Agricultural knowledge systems, 172 Agricultural livelihood strategy, 28 Agro-food system, 108–109, 174 Agro-industrial competitiveness, 141, 143 Agro-industrial models, 114–115 Alternative food networks (AFNs), 108, 109 Analytical knowledge, 181 Appraisal rules, 118 Assemblages, 107–108 actor-centred vision, 113 agri-food models, 108–109 agro-industrial models, 114–115 cognitive factors, 114 domestic models, 114 ecological function, 116 food security, 109–110 GLAMUR project, 110, 112 governance, 117–119 intermediate system, 112 local and global supply chains performance, 110, 111 modern and traditional types, 112 multidimensional and multilevel approach, 119 normative factors, 114 organic quality product, 114 policy tools, 117 re-assembling process, 116 regional food systems, 117 socio-technical configurations, 112 socio-technical entities, 113 sustainability assessment, 116, 117 sustainability dimensions and attributes, 110 territorialization, 114 territorialized food systems, 115, 117 TRANSMANGO project, 116 Bargaining-oriented approach, 185 Blurring farm borders, 143–144 Business resilience, 160 Civil society organizations (CSOs), 116, 118, 119 Climate change, 33, 43, 70–71, 138, 187, 196 Codified knowledge, 181 Cognitive institutions, 56 Commitment rules, 118 Community food security (CFS), 30–31 Conceptual model of food system, 2 activities, 45–48 barriers, 57–58 choices, 58 cross-level and cross-scale interactions, 60 demand, 50–51 ecosystem with technology, 44 feedbacks, 59–60 food system regime, 44, 45 human-made assets, 51–55 institutions, 44, 55–57 loss and waste management, 51 multiple scales and levels, 59, 60, 61 natural assets, 51–53 outcomes, 55 power relations, 44, 58–59 socioecological system (SES), 44 sociotechnical system (STS), 44 supply, 48–50 Conditions-Strategies-Performances (CSP) model, 150 attitudes, 138 decision-making process, 127–128 external conditions, 130–136 internal conditions, 128–130 perception, 136–137 producer performances, 157–159 risk-aversion level, 138 self-organizing system, 136 social learning and knowledge, 137 Contract, types, 155, 156 Crisis and conflict theory, 71 Cross-resources/cross-service costs, 52 Cultural economy model, 42 Decision-making process, 127–128, 139–140, 188, 199–200 Demand-driven approach, 195 Direct entitlements, 25 Ecological services, 82, 101, 134 Entitlement approach, 23, 25–26, 70 Environmental awareness, 195 Environmental security, 55 Ericksen model, 11 Ex ante and ex post risks, 154 Export-oriented industrial food systems, 16 Exposure, 74 Extended governance, 63, 119 External pressures, innovation drivers, 196 Family farming strategies, 2, 129, 136, 161 Farm-generated income, 32 Financial assets, 54 Financial market, 133 Financial resources, 143 Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 24, 28, 51, 172 Food and nutrition security (FNS), 1–5, 10, 109 access dimension, 21–22 agency dimension, 23 availability dimension, 21 community food security (CFS), 30–31 control dimension, 23 ecosystem services, 43 entitlement approach, 23, 25–26 food citizenship, 30 food democracy, 29–30 food insecurity, 13 food security, defined, 20 food sovereignty, 26–27 vs. food system, 11, 12, 15 frames, 34 livelihoods approach, 27–29 neoproductivist framework, 24–25 outcomes, 52, 61 productivism, 24 Right to Food, 29 small farms’ contribution. See also Small farms’ contribution, 40 social and economic factors, 55 stability dimension, 22–23 sustainable, 14, 15, 21, 31–35 utilization dimension, 22 vulnerability assessment, 42 Food chain models, 40, 41 Food citizenship, 29, 30 Food consumption system, 10, 13, 14, 15 Food context models, 41 Food cycle models, 41 Food demand, 45, 46, 50–51, 62, 133 Food democracy, 29–30 Food insecurity, 20, 22, 28 Food loss and waste management, 51 Food poverty, 80 Food processing and packaging, 50 Food production system, 10, 13, 14 Food security, defined, 20 Food sovereignty, 4, 26–27 Food supply, 48–50, 62 Food systems activities, 11, 40, 41 assemblages. See Assemblages components. See also Conceptual model of food system, 41 conceptualizations, 11, 41, 42 consumption system, 13, 14, 15 cultural economy model, 42 defined, 10 diversity, 33 ecological aspect, 62 economic aspect, 62 Ericksen model, 11 export-oriented industrial food systems, 16 global environmental change (GEC), 43 governance, 13, 63–64 imported food, 14 insecurity, 13 mixed farming, 16 multi-actor systems, 17 multisystem interactions, 61–62 outcomes, 42, 43 political aspect, 62 production system, 13, 14 regional approach, 12, 16 self-production, 13 small farms, 17–18 small farms’ connections, 12 social aspect, 62 spatial representation, 15 supermarketization, 10–11 technological aspect, 62 territorial approach, 12, 16 types, 41 vulnerability, 40, 42–43 Food web models, 41 Foresight Report, 24 Foucault’s theory, 181 Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM), 100 Giddens’ theory, 181 GLAMUR project, 110, 112 Global Environmental Change and Food Systems (GECAFS), 42, 43 Global environmental change (GEC), 43 Granovetter’ theory, 181 High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security (HLPE), 9–12, 20 Household resilience, 160 Human assets, 54 Human Ecology, 70 Human-made assets, 45, 51–55, 57–59, 73 Indirect entitlements, 25–26 Innovation policies agricultural/RD innovation, 172 agro-food system, 174 awareness, 173 conventional vs. alternative paradigms, 175 drivers role, 194 environmental impact, industrial agriculture, 172 first-order innovation, 175 goals, 194, 195 governance pattern, 199–200 liberalization, 172 MULTAGRI project, 175 productivist, 174 retailers, 173 rural development, 172 second-order change, 174 second-order/radical innovation. See also Second-order/radical innovation, 175 small farmers, 194–199 supermarkets, 173 SUS-CHAIN project, 175 tandem operation projects, 173 top-down approach, 172 transformational potential, 188 Institutional arrangements (IAs) conditions, 147, 148 contract types, 155, 156 coordination mechanisms, 154 dimensions, 152, 153 ex ante and ex post risks, 154 formal constraints, 147 formal rules, 148 governance types, 150 horizontal cooperation, 148–149 incentive mechanisms, 155 informal rules, 147 market organization, 148 overarching strategy, 150–152 relational contract, 155 settlement risks, 155 social environmental level, 147–148 socio-demographic conditions, 147–148 socio-institutional conditions, 148 supply chain, 152–153 vertical cooperation, 148–150 Insurance market, 133 Intellectual assets, 54 Internal governance, 63, 119 Internal pressures, innovation drivers, 196 International Monetary Fund (IMF), 77 Knowledge infrastructures, 200 Learning process, 179–180 Livelihood framework, 77 Livelihood security model, 27–29 Livestock production, 49 Malnutrition, 22 Market imperfections, 134–136 Market organization, 148 Market orientation, 143 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 53 MULTAGRI project, 175 Multilevel perspective (MLP) features, 177–178 macro level, 181–184 meso level, 180–181 micro level, 179–180 societal functions, 178 socio-technical landscape, 178 transition theory, 177, 178 Natural assets, 45, 51–53, 57–59, 73 Natural hazards approach, 70 Neo-classical economic approach, 144 Neo-institutional approach, 144 Neoliberal development discourse, 26 Neoliberal entrenchment, 24 Neoproductivist framework, 24–25 Non-agricultural livelihood strategy, 28 Normative institutions, 56 Nutrient management scheme, 196 Nutrition security. See also Food and nutrition security (FNS), 21, 28, 29 consumers’ awareness, 33 malnutrition, 22 regional consumption, 31 small farms, 20 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 12 Panarchy Framework, 42 Physical assets, 54 Policy. See also Innovation policies, 133 Post-war productivism, 24 Pressure and Release model, 70 Production-centred approach, 20 Productivism, 24, 27, 35 Purpose-filled-in matrix, 100 Regional governance patterns, 64 Regional production system, 13, 14 Regulations, 133 Regulative institutions, 56 Relational contract, 155 Resilience Alliance, 97 Right to Food, 29 Risk exposure, 133 Risk management, 145–146 Risk-taking activities, 50 Royal Society report, 24–25 Rural development, 144–145 SALSA project, 4 Second-order/radical innovation, 5 black box, 176 dynamics, 185–187 echnological artefacts, 177 linear model, 176 multilevel perspective (MLP). See Multilevel perspective (MLP) neo-classical models, 176 Self-enforced contract, 155 Self-organizing system, 136 Self-reliance, 30–31 Self-service, 173 Self-weighting tools, 173 Semi-subsistence farming, 32, 35 Sensitivity, 74 SES. See Socioecological system (SES) Settlement risks, 155 Seven-step framework, vulnerability assessment adaptation strategies, 103 characteristics, 96–97 cross-scale and cross-level connections, 95 ecological services, 101 factors identification and analysis, 93–95 food system profile, 90–91 framework matrix, 100, 102 Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM), 100 model pathways, 98–99 outcomes, 92–93 performance, 91–92 purpose-filled-in matrix, 100 qualitative and quantitative elements, 100 Resilience Alliance, 97 shocks and stresses, 88, 89 social services, 101 stakeholders engagement, 88–89 TRANSMANGO matrix, 97 two-way communication, 89–90 Vulnerability Scoping Diagram (VSD), 99–100 Small farms’ behaviour agro-industrial competitiveness, 141, 143 blurring farm borders, 143–144 complementary strategies, 140 Conditions-Strategies-Performances (CSP) model. See also Conditions-Strategies-Performances (CSP) model, 126 copes with decline, 146–147 decision-making process, 126 external factors, 127 farmer-centred approach, 126 institutional arrangements (IAs). See also Institutional arrangements (IAs), 126 intermediate and cross-cutting strategies, 139–140 performances and farm resilience, 159–161 political support, 146 qualitative and quantitative analysis, 126 risk management, 145–146 rural development, 144–145 strategic planning, 127 strategies range, 139 strategy types and clusters identification, 140–142 Small farms’ contribution, 31–35 Social assets, 54 Social capital, 180 Social innovation, 173 Social justice, 30 Social learning, 180, 200 knowledge, 137 Social-science frameworks, 81 Socio-demographic factors, 134 Socio-ecological resilience, 160–161 Socio-ecological system (SES), 44, 59, 75–76, 87–88, 97 Socioeconomic vulnerability factors, 71, 72 Socioeconomic welfare, 61 Socio-institutional factors, 133–134 Socio-spatial knowledge networks (SSKN), 137 Socio-technical system (STS), 44, 59, 87–88, 186, 187 actors, 182–183 artefacts, 184 components, 182 material elements, 181 rules and institutions, 183–184 Solidarity networks, 26 Stakeholders engagement, 88–89 Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) approach, 127 Subsistence farming, 32, 35 SUFISA project, 126, 127, 129, 130, 131, 139 Supermarketization, 10–11, 173 Support schemes, 196 SUS-CHAIN project, 175 Sustainable intensification, 24, 25 Sustainable Livelihood Framework, 52 Synthetic knowledge, 181 Tacit knowledge, 181, 186 Technocratic development discourse, 26 Technological devices and methods, 133 Territorialized agro-food systems, 12, 13, 16, 115, 117 Threats, 71 Toronto Food Policy Council, 30 Transaction costs, 134–136 Transition theory, 177, 178, 188 TRANSMANGO project, 80, 81, 97, 116 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 10, 12, 112 Unpacking food systems. See Food systems Vulnerability, 2, 4, 48, 62, 177 assessment. See also Vulnerability assessment, 42, 43, 52, 54–55 climate change, 43, 70 components, 73–75 defined, 73 Entitlements’ approach, 70 external factors, 71, 72, 73 generic factors, 73 hazards, defined, 70–71 households and regions, 40 Human Ecology, 70 human-made assets, 54–55 institutional systems, 57 internal factors, 71, 72, 73 level, 53 natural hazards approach, 70 Panarchy Framework, 42 perturbation, 71 policy implications, 60 Pressure and Release model, 70 specific factors, 73 sphere and knowledge domain, 71 stress, 71 Vulnerability assessment ‘access’ model, 77 causes, 76–77, 80 determinants, 79 dimensions, 87 elements, 84 environmental change, 83 features, 81 individuals and households, 78–79 International Monetary Fund (IMF), 77 model, 84 observed systems, characteristics, 75–76 right-based approach, 78 root causes identification, 82, 87 seven-step method. See Seven-step framework, vulnerability assessment social approach integration, 82 social-science frameworks, 81 sustainability, 84 synthesis, 83 system(s)/people drivers, 83 transgresses disciplines, 81 TRANSMANGO framework, 80, 81 Vulnerability Scoping Diagram (VSD), 99–100 Book Chapters Prelims Introduction Part I Changing Food Systems Small Farming and the Food System Small Farming and Food and Nutrition Security Unpacking Food Systems The Vulnerability of Food Systems Food Systems as Assemblages Part II Farming in the Changing Food Systems Small Farms' Behaviour: Conditions, Strategies and Performances Small Farms and Innovation Innovation Policies for Sustainable, Resilient, Food-secure Systems About the Contributors Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.770 | 0.808 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".