MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245764342 · doi:10.7748/mhp.6.10.10.s13

Marginal issues

2003· article· en· W4245764342 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Gournay, Richard Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueMental Health Practice · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychiatric care and mental health services
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Health Services and Policy Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary sciencePsychologyMedia studiesAdvertisingSociologyComputer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We welcome readers’ letters and entries for the ‘Help wanted’ and ‘People’ sections. But we reserve the right to edit them, and withhold names and addresses or both. Write to: Mental Health Practice, 17-19 Peterborough Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 2AX. Fax: 020 8872 3198 or email: helen.hyland@rcnpublishing.co.uk

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.011
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0030.012
Research integrity0.0090.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1340.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.432 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMental Health PracticeSame topicPsychiatric care and mental health servicesFrench-language works237,207