MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245815713 · doi:10.22215/etd/2014-10302

Flexible Spline Based Models for the Analysis of Panel Data Under a Markov Assumption

2014· dissertation· en· W4245815713 on OpenAlex
Jonathan Boudreau

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSpatial and Panel Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSpline (mechanical)Markov modelPanel dataMarkov chainMarkov processExploratory data analysisData miningEconometricsMachine learningData scienceMathematicsEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Panel data is encountered in a large variety of disciplines, from social sciences to medical studies, and has been used to examine increasingly complex processes. Recent work in the analysis of panel data, particularly under Markov assumptions, has been leading towards models for data that evolve over time. We propose a method for modeling such non-homogeneous processes through the use of splines and penalized splines. We provide a brief overview of spline theory, as well as the basic notions for modeling panel data under a Markov assumption. We then discuss the proposed method and supply examples from simulated and previously modeled data. The proposed method is particularly well suited to exploratory analysis and simplifying complex models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisFrench-language works237,207