MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

[no title]

2018· article· W4245852723 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meagan Evelyn Gough

Bibliographic record

VenueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2018
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeStorytellingStyle (visual arts)HistoryPopulationReservationVisual artsArtSociologyLiteratureLawPolitical scienceDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

125 Reviews REVIEWS MY LIFE, BY LOUIS KENOYER: REMINISCENCES OF A GRAND RONDE RESERVATION CHILDHOOD by Louis Kenoyer, Henry Zenk, and Jedd Schrock foreword by Stephen Dow Beckham Oregon State University Press, Covallis, 2017. Photographs, maps. 320 pages. $35.00, paper. My Life, by Louis Kenoyer is a rare and beautifully contextualized told-to narrative that presents the life and times of Louis Kenoyer and, in doing so, provides invaluable insight into Native-newcomer relations in nineteenth century Oregon. Kenoyer was a member of the first Northwest Oregon tribal group born at Grand Ronde Reservation, of which the vast majority of surviving population was removed in 1856. It is “an extended autobiographical narrative,” originally dictated in the Tualatin dialect of Northern Kalapuya to three linguistic transcribers and as a result is a complete bilingual-Tualatin text (p. 1). This work presents numerous evocative vignettes of daily life told by Kenoyer in his own words and language. There are stories of his experiences in on-reservation schooling, particularly the boarding school known as “the Sisters’ school,” his agricultural work, interactions with newcomers, church and religious teachings, hunting stories, and tales of recreational activities of the era, including horse races. Kenoyer presents his life experiences in a storytelling style inclusive of a number of unique features that the authors astutely contextualize as common among other examples of lower Columbia narrative art. Such unique features of Kenoyer’s narrative style include a focus “on overt action, details of external set and setting being acknowledged only as they help move the action along” (p. 3). My Life is a remarkable work of scholarship for its presentation and analysis of both the content of Kenoyer’s oral history as well as its form. The authors paid great mindfulness to structure the work to best reflect the cultural and personal nuances and subtleties with which Kenoyer spoke. As the authors state: “Our approach to translation is relatively simple. Our goal is to make the English reader’s experience of reading this narrative similar to the Tualatin listener’s experience of hearing it in Tualatin” (p. 54). One way in which the authors set out to accomplish this, and succeed at doing so, is the presentation of the text on the page. The narrative itself is presented in a series of “clusters” that “attempt to present his narrative in a form more reflective of his oral style, as opposed to the artificial confines of English-style paragraphs .” For, “Louis Kenoyer did not speak in paragraphs, so why display his narrative in paragraphs ?” (p. 53). The result is a presentation of the oral history using Kenoyer’s “most common narrative device,” which is “to make a statement and then clarify the idea further in supporting sentences; hence a cluster of sentences takes shape” (p. 53). Of great value is the structural analysis of Kenoyer’s narrative as a work of oral literature and the historical context provided by the authors. In terms of audience, this book will be of keen interest to oral historians, ethnohistorians , anthropologists, linguists, and historians. It will also be of great interest to tribal knowledge holders and Indigenous scholars. This work extends its reach and impact to include the general public interested in Western history , particularly Oregon history and Nativenewcomer histories. Meagan Evelyn Gough Ontario, Canada ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3460.331

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOregon Historical QuarterlySame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207