MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245863462 · doi:10.1016/j.rgmxen.2018.05.014

Current treatment for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

2018· article· es· W4245863462 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos Moctezuma‐Velázquez

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Gastroenterología de México (English Edition) · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFatty liverHepatocellular carcinomaLiver transplantationAlcoholic liver diseaseLiver diseaseDiseasePopulationAdverse effectInternal medicineGynecologyGastroenterologyTransplantationCirrhosisEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is the most prevalent hepatopathy, estimated at 30% in the general population. In the coming years, it will likely be the most common indication for liver transplantation and the most frequent cause of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current treatment for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is based on dietary and exercise interventions that have been shown to be efficacious, even for reverting fibrosis. Unfortunately, compliance with general measures involving lifestyle modifications is very poor, making pharmacologic strategies a necessary option. At present, there are no treatments for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease approved by regulatory agencies, and the only ones with sufficient evidence and recommended by international societies are treatments with pioglitazone and vitamin E, which are not exempt from adverse effects. We review herein the current management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, including dietary and physical activity interventions, available treatments, equivocal therapies, emerging treatments, and treatments presently in clinical trials. La enfermedad por hígado graso no alcohólico es la hepatopatía más prevalente, cercana al 30% de la población general, y se considera será en los siguientes años la indicación más común de trasplante hepático y la etiología más frecuente de carcinoma hepatocelular. El tratamiento actual de la enfermedad por hígado graso no alcohólico se debe basar en las medidas higiénico-dietéticas, que han demostrado ser eficaces incluso para revertir fibrosis. Desafortunadamente, el apego a las medidas generales es muy pobre, de ahí la necesidad de contar con estrategias farmacológicas. Hasta el momento no contamos con tratamientos aprobados por las agencias regulatorias para esta entidad, y los únicos tratamientos recomendados por las sociedades internacionales por tener suficiente evidencia son la pioglitazona y la vitamina E, que no están exentas de efectos adversos. En este artículo revisaremos el estado actual del tratamiento de la enfermedad por hígado graso no alcohólico, incluyendo las medidas higiénico-dietéticas, tratamientos disponibles, fármacos equívocos, tratamientos emergentes, y aquellos que actualmente se encuentran en ensayos clínicos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Gastroenterología de México (English Edition)Same topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207