MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Ursulines

2013· reference-entry· en· W4245893153 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Querciolo Mazzonis

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2013
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ursulines’ history began in 1535 in Brescia (in northern Italy), when Angela Merici established the Company of St. Ursula, a very innovative secular form of consecration for women without vows and common life, free from male supervision, which offered women spiritual and material independence. After the Council of Trent Merici’s rule was significantly altered and the Company developed in many cities in northern Italy where it took different forms (secular, conventual, and congregated). At that time the Ursulines began to educate poor girls in the schools of Christian doctrine and wealthy young women in their convents or colleges. At the end of the century the Company spread to France, where the members increased in numbers and the institute was gradually transformed into an enclosed teaching religious order. Both in Italy and in France the Ursulines became a pioneering institute for female education, overcoming the limitations imposed on women’s active roles. The Company’s development took place in connection with the Tridentine bishops’ aspirations for the re-Christianization of society and with women’s longing for a devout life that combined active service with contemplative spirituality. From France, the Ursulines began their missions in Europe and in the wider world, where they continued to pursue their educational duty toward women. From the beginning of the nineteenth century the Ursulines reinforced their missionary spirit and increased their presence both in Europe and around the world. Although the conventual form was the most common, the Ursulines were still living in a variety of forms of life at this time (including congregated and secular), and they had never been unified centrally (a partially successful attempt to do so took place with the creation of the Roman Union in 1900). After the Second Vatican Council many groups of conventual Ursulines decided to return to forms of life closer to that of the founder. The history of the Ursulines is thus quite complex because the institute adopted different forms of life, models of organization, and religious rules as well as pursued a variety of spiritual objectives. Many of the historiographical works listed here—often composed by members of the order—include collections of documents and present accurate reconstructions of the evolution of specific convents and groups. Scholarship providing social and cultural perspectives of the Ursuline history focus on Merici and the early Ursulines, the order in early modern France, and the missions in Canada and in New Orleans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1040.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and Reformation→Same topicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→French-language works237,207→