MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245896663 · doi:10.4000/nrt.3169

Paul-André Lapointe (dir.), Dialogue social, relations du travail et syndicalisme, Perspectives historiques et internationales, Québec, Presses de l’université Laval, 2016, 317 p.

2017· article· fr· W4245896663 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcel Faulkner, Marc‐Antonin Hennebert

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Nouvelle revue du travail · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les textes réunis dans l’ouvrage dirigé par Paul-André Lapointe abordent la problématique du dialogue social dans une perspective historique qui permet les comparaisons internationales. C’est là la richesse de l’ouvrage qui échappe aussi à une définition restrictive du dialogue social en l’analysant dans sa diversité transnationale et ses dimensions locale, sectorielle et interprofessionnelle. La typologie des régimes de relations professionnelles mise au point par Visser (2009) fournit l’oss...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLa Nouvelle revue du travailSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207