MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245910571 · doi:10.1002/sim.6278

Correction

2014· article· en· W4245910571 on OpenAlexaff
Ying C. MacNab

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics in Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSmoothingMultivariate statisticsBayesian probabilityStatisticsData miningB-splineArtificial intelligenceMathematicsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I would like to make a correction to the paper titled " Regression B-spline smoothing in Bayesian disease mapping: With an application to patient safety surveillance" by MacNab and Gustafson, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:4455-4474. There was an error in expression 15, on page 4462, for the precision matrix in the joint specification of a multivariate proper CAR (MpCAR) prior. The methodological development, statistical computing, and results of the data analysis in the paper are correct; they are based on the conditional specifications of the MCARs and are unaffected by the correction to this expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.320
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.320
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0060.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3070.203

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistics in MedicineSame topicAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsFrench-language works237,207