MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245943110 · doi:10.1063/1.4818440.1

10.1063/1.4818440.1

2013· dataset· en· W4245943110 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDefault Digital Object Group · 2013
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGravity currentCurrent (fluid)MechanicsGeologyMagnitude (astronomy)Head (geology)GeometryPhysicsMathematicsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laboratory experiments are performed to examine gravity currents propagating into an ambient of uniformly decreasing depth. Predominantly, the study is of a surface gravity current shoaling over a bottom slope as it approaches a corner between the horizontal surface and the sloping topography. For sufficiently high Reynolds number currents, they are found to propagate at a constant speed over the slope until the depth of the ambient below the nose is comparable to the depth of the current in the lee of the gravity current nose. It then decelerates at a constant rate set by the product of the reduced gravity, g′, and the magnitude of the topographic slope, s. The shape of the head evolves to form a front parallel to the slope itself and the ambient ahead of the current accelerates downslope with significant turbulence between the ambient and current head. The dependency of the deceleration upon g′s is anticipated from WKB-like extensions of steady-state gravity current theory that include the effect of the ambient depth in one case varying slowly in space as the current first passes over the slope and in another case varying slowly in time as the nose approaches the corner. However, the measured deceleration magnitude of ≃ 0.31( ± 0.01)g′s is found to be larger than these heuristic predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2940.583

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDefault Digital Object GroupSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207