MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Three Poems

2013· article· en· W4245997244 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wang Yun

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Literature Today · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryChinaLiteratureArtSpoken wordBeijingHistoryArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Yun Wang was born in China, and attended Tsinghua University at the age of sixteen. Her poems were featured twice in Tsinghua Literature (Qing Hua Wen Xue ). She edited two poetry anthologies while at Tsinghua, Cadenza (Hua Cai ), and April (Si Yue ). She won second prize in the first Beijing Universities' Poetry Competition. She published poems in The Ugly Duckling (Chou Xiao Ya ), and a number of campus literary journals in Beijing. Her poems were often hand-copied and then circulated among the college students in China in the 1980s. She began writing poetry in English shortly after arriving in the United States for graduate school in Physics in 1985.Yun Wang's second poetry book, The Book of Totality, will be published by Salmon Poetry in 2014. Her first poetry book, The Book of Jade (Story Line Press, 2002), won the Nicholas Roerich Poetry Prize. Her poetry chapbook, The Carp, was published by Bull Thistle Press in 1994. She has published poems in numerous literary journals, including the Kenyon Review, Cimarron Review, Green Mountains Review, International Quarterly, Poet Lore, and many others. Her translations of classical Chinese poetry have been published in Poetry Canada, Willow Springs, Confluence, and Connotation Press.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Literature TodaySame topicPoetry Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207