MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246002799 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100002961

39th Meeting of the Canadian Congress of Neurological Sciences

2004· article· en· W4246002799 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Brian Wheelock, Derek Fewer, Qais Ghanem, Michael Shevell, Morris Cacn, Robert Freedman, Robert Lee, J. N. Findlay, Gregory Cairncross, Joseph Sultan, Darvesh Michael, Hill Christopher, Honey Javidan, Rajiv Midha, Shelly K. Weiss, Elaine Wirrell, Residents Representatives, David Chan, Eve C. Tsai, Jonathan Ponesse, Douglas Calgary, William Calgary, Andrés M. Lozano, James Toronto, Robert Winnipeg, Timothy Benstead Halifax, Ns Gregory, Cairncross Calgary, Richard Desbiens, Quebec City, Ian Halifax, Hans‐Peter Hartung, Alan A. Jackson, Jack H. Jhamandas, A Daniel, Keene Ottawa, Douglas Kondziolka, Terence Calgary, Anthony S. David, Ramsay London, Peter Richardson London, U Guy, Rouleau Montreal, Michael Montreal, Paul Vancouver, B Oksana, Suchowersky Calgary, Andrew Samuel, Wiebe London, Greg L. Bryan, Young London, Sally Gregg

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)MedicineNeurosciencePolitical sciencePsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is published quarterly.The annual subscription rate for Individuals are:C$80 (Canada), US$80 (USA), and US$85 (elsewhere).Subscription rates for Institutions are: C$90 (Canada), US$90 (USA), and US$95 (elsewhere).Resident, intern and student rates are available.See w w w. c j n s .o rg for details.Single copies C$22 each plus postage and handling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2070.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicCerebrovascular and genetic disordersFrench-language works237,207