MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246032048 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db216342

Nigerian economic policy likely to stutter

2016· other· en· W4246032048 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)PresidencyGovernment (linguistics)Economic policyEconomicsBusinessMonetary economicsInternational economicsPoliticsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subject Nigeria's economic outlook. Significance The economy contracted by 2.24% year-on-year in the third quarter, sharper than the 2.10% registered in second quarter, led by the oil sector’s continuing decline. The non-oil sector experienced a slight rebound, expanding for the first time this year. However, results here may prove fleeting as the policy environment becomes inimical to growth into 2017. Implementation of next year’s budget is already at risk from the ongoing stand-off between lawmakers and the presidency, while proposed new foreign exchange (forex) controls could further delay the return of crucial investments. Impacts The medium-term expenditure framework is unlikely to ease investor concerns over the government’s economic policy formulation capacity. Potential lenders may demand external policy assistance -- possibly from the IMF -- before considering extending credit to the government. Delays in the national assembly approving the 2017 budget could further undermine investor confidence and hamper growth potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicFiscal Policy and Economic GrowthFrench-language works237,207