Diet in the Management of Patients with Carotid Stenosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stroke Prevention and Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada In the era of powerful lipid-lowering drugs, a common and mistaken assumption is that diet is unimportant, because the drugs are so much more effective in lowering fasting lipids. On average, a low-fat diet only reduces fasting LDL by about 9%, whereas statin drugs reduce it by 50-60%. However, this approach ignores the importance of post-prandial fat. I have commented recently (1) on the conceptual error of focusing only on fasting lipids; they can be thought of as a baseline, on top of which post-prandial fats are superimposed. Since post-prandial fat is what affects the endothelium for about 18 hours of the day, diet is much more important than is appreciated when it is seen only thoursough the lens of fasting lipids. Indeed, a number of studies show that post-prandial fat is probably more important than fasting lipids (2,3).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".