MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4246086043 · doi:10.24124/2003/bpgub262

Movement patterns, timing of migration and genetic population structure of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the Morice River Watershed, British Columbia.

2003· dissertation· en· W4246086043 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Melinda Ann Bahr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du QuébecUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaBibliographical Society of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTroutWatershedGeographyMovement (music)PopulationFisheryBiologyArtFish <Actinopterygii>DemographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OurSle Nc^e référenceThe author has granted a non exclu sive h cence allow ing the N ational Library o f Canada to reproduce, loan, distribute or se ll cop ies o f this th esis in microform, paper or electronic formats.The author retains ownership o f the c o p y r i^t in th is th esis.N eitiier the th esis nor substantial extracts from it may b e printed or otherw ise reproduced w ithout the author's perm ission.L 'auteur a accordé une licen ce non exclu sive permettant à la B ibliodièque nationale du Canada de reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des co p ies de cette thèse sous la forme de m icrofiche/fîhn, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique.L 'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse.N i la thèse ni d es extraits substantiels de c e lle -c i ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement reproduits sans son autorisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→