Approximate solutions of quasi-equilibrium problems: Lipschitz dependence of solutions on parameters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We introduce a new concept of approximate solutions to quasi-equilibrium problems (QEP) conceived as approximate fixed points of the implicit selection map associated with this problem. As an application, we consider quasivariational inequalities (QVI) for which we discuss several types of approximations from regularization perspectives to devise a consequential term of approximate solutions. Then we present sensitivity analysis results for parametric versions of (QEP) and (QVI) wherein a recent approximate version of the well-known Lim's Lemma is employed to obtain quantitative stability of approximate solutions to these problems. We finally emphasize that the proposed approximate quasi-equilibrium points converge, from both of the qualitative and quantitative stability aspects, to exact solutions. As a further consequence, we improve some previous stability results of solutions to traffic networks problems with respect to feasible flows under perturbation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it