MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246106631 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107337688.009

Industrial Feasting

2014· book-chapter· en· W4246106631 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Hayden

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By any reckoning this was probably the most important event in world history … since the invention of agriculture and cities. – Hobsbawm 1962:29 Indeed, the Industrial Revolution was an earth-shaking development for human cultures. As Hobsbawm notes, it was a revolution in the true sense of the word. It completely transformed almost every aspect of society and environment from economics to education, ideology, politics, family relations, religions, and, of course, feasting. The first signs of change began to appear in Britain, and slightly later in Europe, in the 1780s, attaining a significant influence on society and governments by the 1840s with the building of the railways and construction of massive heavy industry in Britain. After this time, revolutionary changes in society became a constant feature of life continuing into the present with nuclear and computer developments. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, no previous society had been able to break through the productive barrier created by traditional technology, transport, and social structures. Slave-based empires were the maximum expression of political and cultural complexity that could be achieved, and these summits of achievement stretched capabilities to the limit; they were anything but stable. They generally collapsed after only a few hundred years of existence. What the Industrial Revolution achieved for the first time in human history was a seemingly unlimited ability to produce goods, services, and manpower (in machine form) on a constant around-the-clock output basis, coupled with a voracious ability to find, develop, and use new resources. Profit became the dominant credo, and no amount of human suffering deterred its pursuit until Luddite saboteurs and others began to destroy the means of production and tried to overturn the ruling order. Some of the most serious consequences of the Industrial Revolution were social (Hobsbawm 1962:38). Rural families were driven off their lands for new agribusinesses and to provide cheap and mobile labor for the new factories. Families that had provided mutual assistance in agricultural villages were divided and scattered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1200.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicMining and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207