Bone enhancement filtering: Application to sinus bone segmentation and simulation of pituitary surgery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The simulation of pituitary gland surgery requires a precise classification of soft tissues, vessels and bones. Bone structures tend to be thin and have diffuse edges in CT data, and thus the common method of thresholding can produce incomplete segmentations. In this paper, we present a novel multi-scale sheet enhancement measure and apply it to paranasal sinus bone segmentation. The measure uses local shape information obtained from an eigenvalue decomposition of the Hessian matrix. It attains a maximum in the middle of a sheet, and also provides local estimates of its width and orientation. These estimates are used to create a vector field orthogonal to bone boundaries, so that a flux maximizing flow algorithm can be applied to recover them. Hence, the sheetness measure has the essential properties to be incorporated into the computation of anatomical models for the simulation of pituitary surgery, enabling it to better account for the presence of sinus bones. We validate the approach quantitatively on synthetic examples, and provide comparisons with existing segmentation techniques on paranasal sinus CT data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it