MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246210298 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.12094137.v1

Search Is Not Yet a Solved Problem

2020· preprint· en· W4246210298 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBig Data Technologies and Applications
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)Perspective (graphical)Quality (philosophy)Index (typography)Transformation (genetics)Computer scienceMathematics educationWorld Wide WebPsychologyArtificial intelligenceLinguisticsEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This topic is based on the perspective of Daniel Russell. Dan is a professional researcher who works at Google on a team that built the search engine. Google has undergone great transformation over the years in organizing their index and drastically refining the results for the people over the years. The three basic skills of Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic were taught to us since school, Dan emphasizes the need for a 4th R called Research. Learning has changed from a school-only activity to a life- long activity. As a person who can learn the best and know the most has a real advantage so as being a great online researcher. People fluent in search can not only save time but also more likely to find higher quality, more credible and useful content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0040.008
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.572
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBig Data Technologies and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207