MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246225141 · doi:10.1190/1.3447786

Borehole electrokinetics

2010· article· en· W4246225141 on OpenAlex
Paul Glover, Matthew D. Jackson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectrokinetic phenomenaBoreholePoromechanicsGeologyFluid dynamicsPore water pressureMatrix (chemical analysis)ElectrolyteMineralogyPorosityGeotechnical engineeringPorous mediumMechanicsMaterials scienceChemistryComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We now understand the electrical double layer that exists between the minerals that form the rock matrix and the bulk electrolyte which saturates the pores of the rock, at least in the steady state. It is the presence of this double layer that allows the link between the electrical properties and the fluid-flow properties of the rock to exist. In addition, because pore fluid pressure perturbations can be caused by the passage of poroelastic waves, there is also a link between the seismic properties of rocks and their electrical properties. Although postulated more than 70 years ago, there has been an acceleration in the application of electrokinetic and seismoelectric principles to reservoir problems in general and to borehole measurements in particular. In this paper we review briefly the origin of electrokinetic and seismoelectric phenomena before looking at some of the new borehole applications that are being developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it