MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246240204 · doi:10.1007/bf03391566

Low-complexity factor-graph-based MAP detector for filter bank multicarrier systems

2016· article· en· W4246240204 on OpenAlexaff
Fangyu Cui, Minjian Zhao, Yunlong Cai, Benoı̂t Champagne

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Communications and Information Networks · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDetectorFactor graphFilter bankMinimum mean square errorComputer scienceModulation (music)WaveformElectronic engineeringOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingMatched filterAlgorithmMultiplexingBit error rateFilter (signal processing)Control theory (sociology)MathematicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringStatisticsPhysicsDecoding methodsChannel (broadcasting)AcousticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FBMC (Filter Bank Multicarrier) modulation is considered one of the waveform candidates in fifth generation wireless communication technology because of its several improved features compared to conventional orthogonal frequency division multiplexing schemes. A soft-input-soft-output factor-graph-based maximum-a-posterior detector is applied to FBMC systems. The detector achieves better performance than simple linear equalizers such as minimum mean square error and zero forcing in coded systems while exhibiting only a linear growth in complexity with the number of simultaneous interfering symbols. Furthermore, the proposed detector can be easily extended to cases where FBMC modulation is combined with multiple-input-multiple-output processing. The complexity of the detector is analyzed and the simulation results demonstrated its superior performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Communications and Information NetworksSame topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207