MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246280179 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db244413

Improving Nigerian oil fortunes is crucial to rebound

2019· other· en· W4246280179 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresidencyQuarter (Canadian coin)RevenueEconomic policyOpposition (politics)Shut downEconomicsPetroleum industryEconomyDevelopment economicsPolitical scienceBusinessEngineeringFinanceGeographyPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subject Nigeria oil outlook.. Significance Growth in the first quarter of 2019 slowed to 2.1% of GDP, down from 2.38% in the fourth quarter of 2018, according to data released by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) last month. This slowdown was in large part due to contraction in the oil sector of 2.4%, even though production was higher than the preceding quarter. As the federal government struggles to overcome its fiscal crisis, the oil sector’s fortunes are crucial to short-to-medium term recovery. Impacts As its revenue challenges mount, the presidency will likely grow increasingly interventionist in the oil sector, deterring investors. Presidency plans to restart contested production in Ogoniland presents long-term risks amid local tensions and environmentalist opposition. While oil theft is receiving more attention, attempts to curb it may affect fragile Niger Delta peace dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207