Efektivitas Pengendalian Internal Pemungutan Pajak Reklame pada Unit Pelayanan Pemungutan Pajak Daerah Kelapa Gading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui sistem dan prosedur pemungutan pajak dalam mendukung upaya pengendalian internal yang baik pada UPPPD Kelapa Gading. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan menggunakan paradigma interpretif dan pendekatan etnometodologi guna mengeksplorasi mengenai pemahaman dari para aktor atas keterlibatan langsung dalam proses pemungutan pajak reklame. Fokus penelitian ini meliputi sistem dan prosedur pemungutan pajak reklame, unsur-unsur pengendalian internal, komponen pengendalian internal. Data penelitian berupa data primer yang diperoleh melalui wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Sedangkan data sekunder berupa tujuan dan realisasi penerimaan pajak daerah, berbagai peraturan daerah maupun peraturan gubernur. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pengendalian internal UPPPD Kelapa Gading pemungutan pajak reklame efektif. Penggunaan sistem informasi manajemen reklame dapat membantu pegawai dalam memantau dan mengetahui wajib pajak yang masih menunggak pajak. Namun masih terdapat beberapa komponen pengendalian yang kurang maksimal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".