MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246311652 · doi:10.1353/aq.2015.0047

Editor’s Note

2015· article· en· W4246311652 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mari Yoshihara

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Quarterly · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPacific RimHegemonyPacific islandersColonialismEmpirePoliticsAntipodesAdventureImmigrationDecolonizationMilitarismPolitical scienceChinaHistoryGeographyEthnic groupLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editor’s Note Mari Yoshihara We are proud to present “Pacific Currents,” the first special issue of American Quarterly under the Hawai‘i-based editorial team. We chose this theme to showcase the unique intervention into American studies enabled by our particular vantage point. Whether motivated by the strategic interests in the Pacific, the rise of East Asian and Southeast Asian economies, a spiritual search for alternatives to Western modernity, or a pursuit of exoticism, romance, and adventure, men and women of the United States have long looked toward the Pacific. In recent years, China’s rise as a global hegemon has made the United States’ political and economic pivot to the Pacific all the more urgent. In the scholarly discourse of American studies as well, the field’s transnational turn and the increasing attention to the cultures of US Empire have directed many scholars’ inquiries to the Pacific. Yet what the “Pacific” typically signifies in these contexts is that which lies across the ocean from the United States and the nations on the edges of the “Pacific Rim”—that is, East Asian and Southeast Asian nations as well as Canada, Australia, New Zealand—rather than Oceania. The question posed by Arif Dirlik’s classic essay, “What Is in a Rim?,” is still largely neglected, or simply unknown, to many Americanist scholars, even those with expertise in such areas as colonialism and imperialism, militarism, decolonization, immigration, and globalization. Even when the Pacific Islands and Pacific Islanders figure into these discussions, they are often seen as subjects on which European, American, and Asian hegemonies are enacted and/or those to be included in the rubric of Asian America. This special issue is an explicit attempt to shift the terms of such discourses. By focusing our attention on the Pacific itself, the essays in this volume insist on the centrality of Indigenous subjects to the ocean and the islands, as well as to the nations and continents surrounding them. Rather than merely include Pacific Island studies in American studies or search for the intersections and convergences of the two fields, the guest editors and the contributors remain adamantly focused on the tensions and dissonances between the projects of American studies and Native Pacific studies and challenge American studies scholars to see what anticolonial Pacific currents look like. They treat the islands’ inhabitants as agents of histories, memories, and stories, and urge us to trace the origins, flows, and destinations of “Pacific currents” in dramatically different ways than has typically been done. Diverse not only in topics but also in standpoints, modes of narration, and forms of praxis, works featured [End Page vii] in this volume represent the kinds of critical intervention the Hawai‘i-based editorial team seeks to bring to American Quarterly. On behalf of the editorial board, I express my profound respect and gratitude to the guest editors Paul Lyons and Ty Kāwika Tengan, and the scholars, activists, and artists who have taken on this important challenge and allowed American studies and American Quarterly in their midst. [End Page viii] Copyright © 2015 The American Studies Association

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican QuarterlySame topicAsian American and Pacific HistoriesFrench-language works237,207