MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4246312683 · doi:10.3138/utq.79.2.764

Bridging the Past and the Future: Rethinking the Temporal Assumptions of Trauma Theory in Dionne Brand's <i>At the Full and Change of the Moon</i>

2010· article· en· W4246312683 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Julia Grandison

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychicAgency (philosophy)PsychoanalysisTraumatic memoriesPsychologyHistoryLiteratureEpistemologyCognitive psychologyArtPhilosophyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an account of the descendants of a woman who is enslaved, tortured, and driven to assist a mass suicide in nineteenth-century Trinidad, Dionne Brand's At the Full and Change of the Moon represents the intergenerational effects of traumatic experience. In accordance with the writings of theorists such as Cathy Caruth or Nicholas Abraham, who emphasize the disruptive – even trans-generational – persistence of traumatic events, this novel traces the haunting recurrence of images or sentiments associated with traumatic experience across generations. However, while some trauma theorists focus on the disruptiveness of traumatic memory when it recurs in the present, Brand's novel represents moments accompanying traumatic memories as pauses in time during which characters exercise agency. I argue that even when Brand's characters seem to be seized by the past, they also, often very subtly, evoke the future. Consequently, Brand's text supports the work of Ruth Leys, E. Ann Kaplan, and Richard McNally, which recognizes the role of psychic agency in accessing and responding to traumatic memory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.048
Scholarly communication0.0130.014
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Same topicHomelessness and Social Issues→French-language works237,207→