MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246313288 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/arqz9

ANALISIS KELAYAKAN BISNIS RENCANA PENDIRIAN USAHA BUTIK BUSANA LADY CENTER DI PRINGSEWU

2021· preprint· id· W4246313288 on OpenAlexaff
Sapmaya Wulan, Tya Mei Astuti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dunia bisnis saat ini berkembang pesat pada kota-kota berkembang maka tidak dapat dipungkiri pula akan berkembangnya bisnis-bisnis yang ada saat ini. Berkembangnya bisnis tersebut dikarenakan banyakanya permintaan konsumen akan kebutuhan yang harus mereka penuhi. Kebutuhan yang semakin meningkat ini tentunya juga memerlukan sarana dan prasarana dalam pendistribusiannya karena tidak semua orang dapat membuat sendiri kebutuhan sandang yang mereka butuhkan oleh sebab itu mulai bermunculan industri- industri dibidang fashion. Butik merupakan toko pakaian ekslusif yang menjual berbagai macam pakaian yang berbeda. Untuk mendirikan Butik Lady Center perlu ada rancangan perkiraan biaya yang diperlukan, modal yang dibutuhkan dan benefit yang akan diperoleh. Sebelum rencana Butik Lady Center dilaksan akan terlebih dahulu perlu dilakukan Analisis Kelayakan Bisnis untuk mengetahui kelayakan usaha tersebut. Untuk itu yang menjadi permasalahan penelitian iniadalah: Apakah rencana mendirikan Butik Lady Center di Pringsewu layak untuk dilaksanakan ? Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kelayakan rencana usaha Butik Lady Center di Pringsewu. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dan kualitatif, dimana untuk metode kuantitatif digunakan tiga Kriteria Investasi yaitu: Net Present Value (NPV), Net Benefit Cost Ratio (Net B/C), Internal Rate of Return (IRR); Analisis Pay Back Period (PBP), dan Analisis Break Even Point (BEP)dan untuk metode kualitatif digunakan pendekatan non-finansial yakni aspek teknis, aspek pasar dan pemasaran, aspek yuridis (hukum), aspek birokrasi, aspek manajemen dan sdm, aspek ekonomis, dan aspek lingkungan. Berdasarkan hasil analisis finansial diperoleh NPV =Rp 467.412.569; Net B/C = 1,19 ; IRR = 35,83%, analisis Pay Back Period selama 3 tahun 9 bulan 9 hari, dan analisis Break Even Point selama 3 Tahun 1 Bulan 26 Hari. Berdasarkan hasil analisis kuantitatif dan kualitatif dapat disimpulkan bahwa rencana mendirikan Butik Lady Center layak untuk dilaksanakan (go).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207