MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246318006 · doi:10.1126/science.304.5673.935a

WEB TEXT: The Science of Sight

2004· article· en· W4246318006 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSightWorld Wide WebWeb applicationComputer scienceAstronomyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Do you see faint blobs where the white “avenues” cross in the diagram? You're not losing your eyesight; you've simply fallen for the Hermann grid illusion, one of the tricks that help researchers deduce the workings of the visual system. For a clear view of how we see, check out The Joy of Visual Perception, an undergraduate-level Web text by professor emeritus of psychology Peter Kaiser of York University in Toronto, Canada. Students can start by focusing on physiology and anatomy, including the structure of the eye and the transmission of messages across the gaps between neurons. Other sections let us peer into subjects such as how we perceive contrast, size, motion, and distance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.020
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and ResearchFrench-language works237,207