Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our Future as History Nous, membres de l'I.B.S. et plus généralement des sociétés savantes et professionnelles, vivons actuellement des heures exaltantes, face aux défis à relever. Il s'agit pour nous d'organiser et de planifier activement l'avenir, et de considérer celui‐ci comme de l'Histoire future. «Notre futur, c'est de l'Histoire»: ce qui est à venir devient le présent et le présent devient Histoire. A cet effet, je reprendrai et développerai les thèmes déjà identifiés lors de mon discours présidentiel de Montréal: je présenterai brièvement l'état de notre organisation ainsi que ses initiatives récentes, et j'anticiperai à partir de là sur les besoins en termes d'essor de nos activités présentes et de création de nouvelles activités. C'est par ces actions que nous garantirons l'avenir que nous appelons de nos vœux, et par là même que nous laisserons à nos successeurs un héritage dont nous pourrons être fiers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.621 | 0.337 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".