MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Conference Chairs

2020· article· en· W4246345031 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceChinaTechnical universityPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Prof. Ramesh K. Agarwal, Washington University in St. Louis, USA Prof. Steven Y. Liang, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA Program Committee Chairs Prof. Jing Wang, University of South Florida, USA Prof. Devki N. Talwar, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, USA Prof. Xu Chen, University of Washington, USA Prof. Yong Suk Yang, Pusan National University, Korea Prof. Farhang Pourboghrat, The Ohio State University, United States Technical Committees Prof. Anselmo Alves Bandeira, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil Prof. Mohd Rafie Bin Johan, University of Malaya, Malaysia Prof. Fei Zhou, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China Assoc. Prof. Wenke Gao, Lanzhou University of Technology, China Prof. Abhijit Chanda, Jadavpur University, India Prof. Himadri Chattopadhyay, Jadavpur University, India Prof. Velamurali, Anna University, India Prof. A. Elaya Perumal, Anna University, India Prof. N. V. Raghavendra, National Institute of Engineering, Mysuru, India Prof. Recai KUS, Selcuk University, Turkey Assoc. Prof. Prasanna Shakti Jena, Vardhaman College of Engineering, India Dr. Kamran Shavezipur, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, USA Dr. Marco Castellani, University of Birmingham, UK Dr. Marta Menegoli, Naica SC, Italy Dr. Aydin Berenjian, The University of Waikato, Ireland Dr. D. Ramasamy, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia Dr. Mohsen Motahari-Nezhad, Shahid Beheshti University Dr. Hatem Mrad, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Canada Dr. Chen-Yuan Chung, National Central University, Taiwan Dr. Aydin Berenjian, The University of Waikato, Ireland

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207