MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<scp>US</scp>Civil War (1861–65)

2018· other· en· W4246361173 on OpenAlexaff
Francis M. Carroll

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Diplomacy · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecessionSpanish Civil WarNavyPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)ShipyardLawEuropean unionForeign policyEconomic historyInternational tradeHistoryAncient historyBusinessShipbuildingPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The secession of the eleven Southern states from the Federal Union of the United States in 1860 and 1861 led to the American Civil War and created a very complicated international situation. The primary objective foreign policy of the Union government was to prevent the European powers from extending diplomatic recognition or opening trade relations with the Confederacy, while the Southern government worked to obtain diplomatic recognition, purchase needed military supplies, and acquire ships from Europe for its navy. Periodic crises emerged over theTrentaffair, the building of Confederate ships in British shipyards, France's incursions into Mexico, and hostile Confederate activities based in British North America. When the Civil War finally ended in April of 1865, relations between the United States and Britain and France were strained but hostilities had been avoided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of DiplomacySame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207