International News/Nouvelles Internationales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The organizing committee of the XII World Forestry Congress is currently working on a set of themes that link forests and communities.These themes will bring the concept of harmony to the fore, serving as a focal point for all the discussions and reaching out, worldwide, to as many forestry stakeholders as possible.The theme will be dealt with from four main components relating to targeted forest issues. State of the forests: trends and outlook Needs, values and aspirations Decisions made and present and future actionsThe future: a vision for the coming decades Forests and Communities in Harmony is intended to provide an ideal opportunity for discussions on the unique universe that forests represent.These themes will endeavour to show that people (specialists, foresters, ecologists, workers, sil-viculture experts, farmers, craftspeople and citizens) from all walks of life play a primary role in the decision-making and the activities that shape the forests of today and tomorrow.People are also the reason we need to take a closer look at forests; their management must serve to sustain societies and communities at the local, regional and international levels.The Congress is open to all individuals, whether they are foresters or not, to men and women of all ages and to members of Aboriginal communities, as well as those who have recently demonstrated interest in the forestry community.It will address the concerns of all those interested in the future of all the forests of the world, including tropical, temperate, boreal, virgin forests, and those that are managed with various techniques, whether they are in plantations or being restored.The focus will be on human factors given that the environment, the economy, society and culture must be viewed as an indivisible whole in efforts to ensure the sustainable development of forest ecosystems.As the first fmstry congress of the thirdmillennium, the XI1 World Forestry Congress 2003 will provide an opportunity for the international forestry community to gather and to develop a vision to orient actions over the coming decades.All those who are dedicated to the sustainable development of forests are invited to attend this key event.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.287 | 0.203 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".