MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246399905 · doi:10.1002/ange.202010211

Carboxyboronate as a Versatile In Situ CO Surrogate in Palladium‐Catalyzed Carbonylative Transformations

2020· article· en· W4246399905 on OpenAlexafffund
Chieh‐Hung Tien, Alina Trofimova, Aleksandra Holownia, Branden S. Kwak, Reed T. Larson, Andrei K. Yudin

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConnaught Fund
KeywordsChemistryPalladiumArylSonogashira couplingCatalysisCombinatorial chemistryCarbonylationNucleophileHalideOrganic chemistryCarbon monoxideAlkyl

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The application of carboxy‐MIDA‐boronate (MIDA= N ‐methyliminodiacetic acid) as an in situ CO surrogate for various palladium‐catalyzed transformations is described. Carboxy‐MIDA‐boronate was previously shown to be a bench‐stable boron‐containing building block for the synthesis of borylated heterocycles. The present study demonstrates that, in addition to its utility as a precursor to heterocycle synthesis, carboxy‐MIDA‐boronate is an excellent in situ CO surrogate that is tolerant of reactive functionalities such as amines, alcohols, and carbon‐based nucleophiles. Its wide functional‐group compatibility is highlighted in the palladium‐catalyzed aminocarbonylation, alkoxycarbonylation, carbonylative Sonogashira coupling, and carbonylative Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of aryl halides. A variety of amides, esters, (hetero)aromatic ynones, and bis(hetero)aryl ketones were synthesized in good‐to‐excellent yields in a one‐pot fashion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte ChemieSame topicCatalytic Cross-Coupling ReactionsFrench-language works237,207