MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4246408376 · doi:10.24124/2015/bpgub1676

Kindergarten readiness: a handbook for parents of kindergarten-aged children

2015· dissertation· en· W4246408376 on OpenAlexaff
Leah Spergel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarly Childhood Education and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyDevelopmentally Appropriate PracticeWonderEarly childhood educationTransition (genetics)PedagogyMathematics educationSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kindergarten marks a momentous transformation for both child and family. Along with this change comes many worries and anxieties. Parents often wonder if their child is developmentally ready to attend kindergarten. They also want to know what they can do to help their child transition easily into kindergarten. Being certain the child is ready for kindergarten can make this move to a formal school setting a much more pleasant and successful experience. This project was created to prepare parents by providing them with information surrounding kindergarten readiness and was developed using the content analysis of various other parent handbooks, as well as current research on selected topics. In addition to information regarding the importance of kindergarten readiness, the concepts of kindergarten curricula, developmental milestones of a kindergarten-aged child, and the significance of building family-school partnerships are included. The handbook also recommends many strategies for parents to support their child's learning before kindergarten begins. --Leaf ii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEarly Childhood Education and Development→French-language works237,207→