MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246423131 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.8718

La croix de Triquet

2012· book· fr· W4246423131 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John MacFarlane

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2012
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1945, le romancier F. Scott Fitzgerald écrivait : « Montrez-moi un héros, je vous écrirai une tragédie. » Cette phrase aurait pu être écrite à propos de Paul Triquet. Seul Canadien français à avoir obtenu la croix de Victoria pour un fait d'armes accompli en Italie durant la Deuxième Guerre mondiale, ce simple soldat est poussé sous les feux de la rampe pour en faire un exemple. Mais on ne devient pas un héros impunément. L'histoire de Triquet révèle le cynisme des autorités militaires qui retouchent à petits traits sa vie pour en faire une légende qui cadre mieux avec leurs visées : stimuler l'effort de guerre et encourager l'enrôlement. Le costume de héros est toutefois un peu trop grand, et de l'avoir endossé laissera des séquelles douloureuses non seulement dans la vie privée et professionnelle de Triquet, mais aussi dans l'histoire militaire canadienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooksSame topicAmerican and British Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207