Issue Information ‐ Editorial Policy‐French
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Énoncé de principes Politique rédactionnelleRecherche comptable contemporaine (RCC) est la principale publication de recherche de l'Association canadienne des professeurs de comptabilité.Elle diffuse des travaux de recherche d'avant-garde favorisant dans la collectivité une meilleure compréhension de tous les aspects du rôle de la comptabilité au sein des organisations, des marchés ou de la société.D'origine canadienne et de portée mondiale, RCC vise à refl éter la diversité intellectuelle de la recherche comptable sur la scène mondiale.C'est pourquoi RCC accepte les travaux intéressants et rigoureux sur le plan conceptuel qui sont susceptibles d'enrichir les connaissances en comptabilité, quels que soient le domaine de la comptabilité abordé, la méthode appropriée utilisée, et la discipline ou la tradition de recherche sous-jacente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.061 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.032 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.598 | 0.461 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".