Aneuploidy in human spermatozoa: FISH analysis in men with constitutional chromosomal abnormalities, and in infertile men
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reproductive difficulties are associated intimately with cytogenetic abnormalities. This article reviews multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization studies on spermatozoa from men with constitutional chromosomal abnormalities and the consequences for spermatozoa, and on chromosomal abnormalities in the spermatozoa of infertile men who have normal somatic karyotypes. In 47,XYY men, the frequencies of 24,XY and 24,YY spermatozoa appear to be < or = 1%. Klinefelter (47,XXY) and mosaic Klinefelter patients had sperm aneuploidy frequencies of 2-25% and 1.5-7.0%, respectively. Robertsonian translocation carriers had 3-27% spermatozoa unbalanced for the chromosomes involved in the translocation, with a possible modest interchromosomal effect, but none of the increased frequencies of chromosomal disomy approached 1%. The frequency of chromosomally unbalanced spermatozoa in reciprocal translocations averages 50%, is strongly dependent on the chromosomes involved in the individual translocation, and may be slightly increased as a result of a small interchromosomal effect. Infertile men with a normal karyotype and low sperm concentration or certain types of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa have a significantly increased risk of producing aneuploid spermatozoa, particularly for the sex chromosomes. An increased risk of sperm aneuploidy was not observed in infertile men with poor sperm motility or in those with a normal karyotype and normal semen parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".