MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246462914 · doi:10.4000/ifha.8145

Susanne Rau, Räume: Konzepte, Wahrnehmungen, Nutzungen

2014· article· de· W4246462914 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2014
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyBusiness administrationBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’importance et la place d’une problématique au sein d’une discipline se mesurent aussi à l’aune des manuels qui lui sont consacrés. Ces ouvrages constituent souvent une certaine cristallisation des connaissances qui sont considérées désormais, du moins en partie, comme acquises ; mais ils peuvent parfois aussi afficher un caractère plus programmatique et donc esquisser les contours d’un champ de recherche qu’il s’agit encore d’explorer. Consacré au domaine des recherches historiques sur l’e...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.011
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicEcology, Conservation, and Geographical StudiesFrench-language works237,207