MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246480251 · doi:10.4161/chim.15083

Divide and conquer

2011· article· en· W4246480251 on OpenAlexaff
Govindarajan Thangavelu, Colin C. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueChimerism · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBTLAImmunologyImmune systemBiologyTransplantationAutoimmunityStem cellHematopoietic stem cell transplantationHaematopoiesisGraft-versus-host diseaseLymphocyteMonoclonal antibodyT cellAntibodyMedicineCell biologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the main objectives in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) research is the prevention of graft versus host disease (GVHD) while maintaining the graft versus leukemia/lymphoma (GVL) effect. Whether these two responses generated by donor T cells can be sufficiently separated and controlled remains controversial. While various approaches have been tested to achieve this goal, success has been relatively limited. Lymphocyte responses are negatively regulated by a series of receptors that function along with antigen receptors to deliver co-inhibitory signals. B and T lymphocyte associated (BTLA) is a novel co-inhibitory molecule expressed by activated T cells, B cells and other immune cells. A study by Albring et al. has now shown in a murine model that a single injection of agonistic anti-BTLA monoclonal antibody can inhibit GVHD long-term while maintaining GVL responses and immunity to infection. These studies suggest that future development of biologics to harness the function of co-inhibitory signals will be an important approach in the prevention of autoimmunity and GVHD and in protocols to achieve transplantation tolerance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0110.013
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChimerismSame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207