L’échec scolaire et le rapport aux enseignants et enseignantes : aperçu du point de vue de jeunes du secondaire au Gabon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Gabon, comme dans plusieurs pays, la question de l’échec scolaire est centrale et comporte des répercussions économiques et sociales importantes. Bien que disposant de compilations statistiques sur la situation, aucune recherche ne s’est intéressée jusqu’à maintenant à éclairer cette question de l’intérieur, soit du point de vue des élèves. D’où le propos de la recherche doctorale que j’ai récemment menée de convier des élèves gabonais du secondaire à livrer leur expérience sur le sujet, par le biais d’entretiens individuels et collectifs. En m’appuyant sur une perspective qui conjugue interactionnisme symbolique et didactique, je me suis plus précisément intéressé au sens qu’ils accordent aux situations et relations ayant marqué leur expérience scolaire. L’analyse de leurs discours a permis de faire ressortir que l’échec scolaire participerait d’un ensemble de médiations dont le rapport aux enseignants et enseignantes et, plus spécifiquement, la « face négative » de ce rapport.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".