MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246528592 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2014.7417760

Mobile Virtual Network Admission Control and Resource Allocation for Wireless Network Virtualization: A Robust Optimization Approach

2014· article· en· W4246528592 on OpenAlexaff
Chengchao Liang, F. Richard Yu

Bibliographic record

Venue2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAdmission controlComputer networkQuality of serviceWireless networkResource allocationCall Admission ControlVirtualizationDistributed computingNetwork virtualizationOptimization problemWirelessCloud computingTelecommunicationsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless network virtualization is a promising technology in next generation wireless networks. In this paper, motivated by the experience of user equipment (UE) admission control in traditional wireless networks, we propose a novel concept of mobile virtual network (MVN) admission control for wireless virtualization. By limiting the number of MVNs embedded in the physical network, MVN admission control can effectively guarantee quality of service (QoS) experienced by users of MVNs and maximize the utilization of the physical networks at the same time. Specifically, we propose a two-stage MVN embedding mechanism that can decouple short-term physical resource allocation from long-term admission control and resource leasing. With recent advances in robust optimization, we formulate the MVN admission control problem as a robust optimization problem. Both the long-term admission control and short- term resource allocation problems are transformed to convex problems, which can be solved efficiently. Simulation results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207