MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246536360 · doi:10.24124/2016/bpgub1184

Single-frequency terahertz Michelson interferometer for applications in wood products

2016· dissertation· en· W4246536360 on OpenAlexaff
Kimberly Amanda Lawyer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTerahertz technology and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerahertz radiationMichelson interferometerInterferometryOpticsMicrowaveComputer scienceEngineeringMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is an ever-growing demand in the wood products industry for cost-effective and compact equipment to ensure wood quality measures and specifications are met. Recently, terahertz (THz) technology has begun to pave the way for new, non-destructive imaging techniques rather than the standard use of X-ray or microwave technology. A prototype THz Michelson interferometer operating at 0.102 THz was developed to measure the indices of refraction and absorption coefficients of maple, hemlock and birch. These measurements were compared to the Picometrix system, which uses conventional THz time-domain spectroscopy and has been implemented in an industrial setting for the real-time measurement of the density of OSB flakes. However, the cost and complexity of the Picometrix system prohibits its use for many industrial applications. The interferometer is cost-effective, compact and provides accurate data at low THz frequencies, thus providing an excellent alternative direction for new THz technology in the wood products industry. --Leaf ii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTerahertz technology and applicationsFrench-language works237,207