Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fulfilling its mandate of international dental implant education, the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) continues to expand globally without diluting the quality of its expansive clinical resources and education. Meetings that have been held or planned to be held in various countries exhibit a panoply of inspirational sharing and teaching methodologies. The list of nations, among others, include Malaysia, Germany, the United States, Vietnam, Iran, Israel, Poland, Lebanon, and Morocco. The combination is unique; that is, we share the knowledge of oral implantology/dental implants with practitioners, researchers, and vendors in their own milieus. So, it is not just a matter of sightseeing, but of learning what everyone is doing professionally. Seasoned and neophyte speakers impart what they do, how they do those procedures, and why they do them. Updated presentations backed by evidence-based and scientifically acknowledged practicalities are the responsibilities of speakers, both known and new. Although the lingua franca is English, simultaneous translations allow the audiences to tune into the new vision delivered from the podiums. So, let us give credit where credit is due. Dr. Ken Judy envisioned the outreach of the ICOI, as had the late Dr. Carl Misch. Currently, the global scope of an international family that shares the professional attributes is expanding. Indeed, it is flourishing without any dilution of the quality of its powerful educational updates. Within the fulfillment of these symposia, there are the niche cosponsored meetings in the academic settings of both New York University and the Columbia University. These learning experiences are without peer because they have been honed and refined over many years. Encouraging these pursuits, under the tutelage of Dr. Judy, Dr. Ady Palti continues to arrange programs in Malaysia, China, Singapore, Australia, South American countries, Canada, and back in the United States. His energy and desire to foster inclusiveness continue unabated. The reaching out continues as you read this. It should enhance your desire to keep pursuing your professional growth through the ICOI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.036 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".