MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4246548682 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.642

Recent developments in kidney cancer

2013· article· en· W4246548682 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michael Leveridge, Michael A.S. Jewett

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoKingston General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNephrectomyGynecologyLymphadenectomyKidney cancerRenal cell carcinomaUrothelial cancerGeneral surgeryCancerOncologyInternal medicineKidneyBladder cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) diagnosis and management haveundergone significant shifts in the recent past. The increasing rateof diagnosis of small renal masses, often in patients at high risk ofmorbidity with operative treatment, has led to studies, trials anddiscoveries in renal mass biopsy, active surveillance and minimallyinvasive thermal ablation. At the other end of the disease spectrum,targeted systemic therapies for metastatic RCC have supplantedcytokine-based treatment, with significant benefits to progressionand survival. Recent reviews and trials have also cemented the roleof partial nephrectomy as standard surgical management for mostlow-stage masses, and the roles of regional lymphadenectomy andadrenalectomy concomitant with nephrectomy have been clarified.This review aims to highlight recent evidence that has emerged inthe management of this complicated oncologic issue.Le diagnostic d’hypernéphrome et la prise en charge de cettemaladie ont fait l’objet d’importants changements au cours desdernières années. Le taux accru de cas de petites masses rénales,souvent chez des patients présentant un risque élevé de morbiditéavec le traitement chirurgical, a amené la conduite d’étudeset d’essais qui ont entraîné des découvertes touchant la biopsiedes masses rénales, la surveillance active et l’ablation thermiqueminimalement invasive. À l’autre bout du spectre pathologique, lestraitements généraux ciblés de l’hypernéphrome métastatique ontsupplanté le traitement à base de cytokines, ce qui a amené desavantages significatifs sur le plan de la progression et de la survie.Des articles de synthèse et des essais récents ont aussi confirméle rôle de la néphrectomie partielle en tant que prise en chargechirurgicale standard pour la plupart des masses de faible stade,et les rôles de la lymphadénectomie régionale et de la surrénalectomieen concomitance avec une néphrectomie ont été clarifiés.Le présent article vise à faire ressortir les données récentes dans laprise en charge de ce problème oncologique complexe

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association Journal→Same topicRenal cell carcinoma treatment→French-language works237,207→