Integrated geophysical appraisal of crustal architecture in the eastern Lachlan Orogen
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forward modelling of potential field data, combined with new geological mapping and deep seismic reflection transects acquired by the Australian Geodynamics Cooperative Research Centre (AGCRC), has led to testing of robust crustal architectural models for the eastern Lachlan Orogen of New South Wales. This integrated analysis has led to new subsurface inferences unlikely to be deduced solely from any of the individual datasets used.The overall Palaeozoic history of the eastern Lachlan Orogen implied by the integrated analysis of geophysical and geological datasets, involves: formation of an Ordovician oceanic island arc ;early Silurian thin-skinned east-directed overthrusting of a continental backarc basin over the arc; generation of Silurian granites due to crustal thickening; early Silurian to early Devonian rifting, resulting in the dismemberment of the deformed arc-basin complex, and formation of a series of arc fragments with intervening thin basins; tight, asymmetric folding of these basins during the Early to Mid Devonian, with some granite magmatism; extensive Carboniferous thin-skinned thrust stacking involving both east-, and west-directed transport, and slicing of the upper structural level of earlier antiformal stacks, together with granite roof zones; and final granitic arc magmatism during amalgamation with the New England Orogen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it