MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246658813 · doi:10.4000/laboreal.10954

Norma

2009· article· en· W4246658813 on OpenAlexaff
Abdallah Nouroudine

Bibliographic record

VenueLaboreal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative International Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La norma como referencia Etimológicamente, norma viene del latín norma que significa escuadro, es decir, lo que sirve para hacer derecho. Esto conduce a considerar la norma como una referencia o un modelo para determinar lo normal. Partiendo de esto, cualquier acto por el cual un hecho es reportado a una norma se traduce por la determinación discriminatoria de lo normal y de lo anormal. La conformidad del hecho en relación a la norma constituye lo normal ; y el desvío del hecho relativamente ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.013
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaborealSame topicComparative International Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207