Development of transmission system reliability performance benchmarks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reliability of an electric utility transmission system is a measure of its ability to continuously meet the demands of all its customers (i.e., points of delivery). Enhancing the supply reliability is one of planning and design targets of any utility within the constraints of capital investments, intense free-market competition, variable and higher level of customer preferences, and safety and environmental considerations. The utilization of transmission system facilities is changing from its traditional role in this new deregulated era and raising significant concerns about the possible erosion of the reliability of utility transmission facilities. It has been recognized that, with the movement toward a deregulated and competitive electricity market, decisions to improve reliability will be heavily influenced by industrial and commercial customer preferences requiring service level benchmarks to be defined. This paper presents an approach to establish realistic transmission system reliability performance benchmarks that provide a measure against which the different planning and design procedures can be evaluated to assist in achieving the primary objective of providing reliable electricity with competitive rates to utility customers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it