MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246708733 · doi:10.4000/eccs.3206

« Grâce à elle(s) ? » : le rôle des femmes dans la construction du Canada

2020· paratext· fr· W4246708733 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes canadiennes / Canadian Studies · 2020
Typeparatext
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce numéro 88 fait suite au Congrès annuel de l’Association française d’études canadiennes qui s’est tenu à Bordeaux du 12 au 14 juin 2019 sur le thème « Grâce à elle(s) ? » : le rôle des femmes dans la construction du Canada. À une époque où le Canada s’enorgueillit d’adopter « une politique d’aide internationale féministe » pour promouvoir l’égalité des sexes et contribuer au renforcement du pouvoir des femmes et des filles dans le monde, il apparait particulièrement opportun d’examiner les faits et les questions relatifs aux femmes et à la manière (sous-évaluée ?) dont elles ont contribué à la construction du Canada. À travers une sélection d’articles représentatifs, ce nuérmo reflète la richesse et la diversité des contributions que cette thématique a inspirées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes canadiennes / Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207