Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concepts of precariousness and precarity are multivalent, with different conceptual and political traditions reflected in different disciplinary approaches. In geography, the notion of precarious work has been utilized by economic and labor geographers exploring the flexibilization of labor markets, changing relations of employment, and the conditions of low‐paid and migrant workers in the Global North. This research has focused on economic restructuring, changing policy and regulatory regimes, and new employment norms at a variety of scales – often in relation to macro‐economic changes associated with evolving relations of capitalist production and the rise of neoliberalism. These approaches overlap, however, with articulations of precarity and precarious life that explore, on the one hand, generalized political and social conditions of existence and, on the other, micro‐level material and embodied ways in which insecurity and vulnerability are experienced and understood. Moreover, the applicability of the concept of precarious work to economies with widespread informality requires critical consideration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it