Variability and distribution among sample test results when sampling unprocessed wheat lots for ochratoxin A
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2008, Health Canada announced it was considering the establishment of maximum levels for ochratoxin A (OTA) in unprocessed wheat, oats, and their products. The Canada Grains Council and Canadian National Millers Association initiated two studies to measure the variability and distribution among sample test results for unprocessed wheat and oats so that scientifically based OTA sampling plans could be designed to meet regulatory and industry requirements. Sampling statistics related to detecting OTA in oats has been published. 54 OTA contaminated wheat lots representing three wheat classes were identified for the sampling study. Each lot was sampled according to a nested experimental protocol where sixteen 2-kg laboratory samples were taken from each lot, multiple 5-g test portions were taken from each comminuted 2-kg laboratory sample, and multiple OTA measurements were made on each test portion using liquid chromatography. The sampling, sample preparation, and analytical variances associated with each step of the OTA test procedure were found to be a function of OTA concentration and regression equations were developed to predict the functional relationships between variance and OTA concentration. When sampling a wheat lot containing 5 µg/kg OTA with an OTA test procedure consisting of a sampling step employing a single 2-kg laboratory sample, sample preparation step employing a single 100-g test portion, and an analytical step that used liquid chromatography to quantify OTA, the sampling step accounted for 95.3% of the total variability. The observed OTA distribution among the 16 OTA sample results was found to be positively skewed and the negative binomial distribution was selected to model the OTA distribution among sample test results. The sampling statistics were incorporated into the FAO Mycotoxin Sampling Tool and the chances of rejecting good lots and accepting bad lots were calculated for various sampling plan designs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it